Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 04:08

Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
What are the differences between promotions and sales?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sovereignty Wins 2025 Belmont Stakes, Beats Journalism in Final Triple Crown Leg - Bleacher Report
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Prince William’s friend Sunjay Kapur dies after swallowing a bee at polo match - New York Daily News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
How can I get my ex-husband to love me again?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Million-Dollar Project Aims to Expose Bad Medical Research - Gizmodo
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is reducing immigration a potential solution to the housing crisis in Britain?